Dear OSPCA: Thank you for the warning!

So, after the horrors revealed by the Star at that torture chamber for marine animals (and other species), Marineland, the OSPCA has decided (no doubt after a zillion phone calls)- maybe, just maybe, we need to actually INSPECT this place - this despite many groups over many years complaining to them about the conditions there!

So, do they go in quietly, unannounced - you know, to actually SEE the reality?
Nope, they give them NOTICE they're coming in there.

Marineland is privately owned by John Holer and licensed by the self-regulating Canadian Association of Zoos and Aquariums.

I also highly question some of the organizations involved that assert they've never had a complaint before.

Mallory says the Niagara Falls Humane Society has not received complaints about the care of sea mammals at Marineland.

I can't imagine I'm the ONLY one who complained to them; albeit my call came 25+ years ago; but conditions for these poor animals have clearly worsened, if anything, and I don't for one second believe I'm the only one who would walk in there and see immediately that the conditions are horrific for any animal.
As for CAZA, who ostensibly cleared Marineland and accredited them:

CAZA is the national voice of the zoo and aquarium community in Canada. Representing the 25 leading zoological parks and aquariums in Canada, its purpose is to promote the welfare of zoo and aquarium wildlife, to advance related science and conservation, and to foster public engagement in the preservation of our natural heritage.

CAZA was formed in 1975 as a national, not-for-profit service organization. Since that time it has played an invaluable role in bringing Canada’s zoos and aquariums to the forefront of international standards of animal care. It helps Canadians understand and appreciate the diversity of nature and its importance to their survival. It supports research to preserve threatened species and their habitat, works to preserve the genetic diversity of species and to minimize the live capture of animals. CAZA reaches out to educate youth, in cooperation with local school boards, it partners with governments and non-governmental organizations around the world in seeking to preserve wildlife. And it works to standardize professional conduct through a rigorous Code of Ethics and a comprehensive accreditation system.

Trying to figure out here who FUNDS them.  They apparently have the stamp of approval from the Canadian government according to their website. But then the Canadian government has a pretty poor batting average when it comes to the protection of animal rights, so I'm not entirely surprised.  But then, as "There is no government regulation in Canada or Ontario of marine mammal parks or, for that matter, of any animal park." it is moot - as that in reality means any kind of "pass" is based on questionable criteria.

If, in fact, CAZA did a proper inspection then the bar for their standards is clearly set FAR too low.

In the end, it all comes down to money.  The welfare of the animals, their health, their mental and spiritual well being are so far behind the requirement for them to act unnaturally for oblivious patrons it is enough to bring you to tears.

Call your MPPs - call the Ontario Community Safety Minister Madeleine Meilleur, who oversees the OSPCA and tell her (as Frank Klees aptly puts) to "save" her tears and mobilize action.

“The minister should turn her tears into action,” said Newmarket—Aurora Conservative MPP Frank Klees, who has pushed for action on animal abuse issues. “This is just one more example of the government abdicating responsibility in the area of animal welfare.”

Though not a fan usually of the PC's, MPP Frank Klees has walked the walk when it comes to animal welfare issues and not just talked the talk as does NDP MPP Cheri DiNovo who says it was “absolutely horrifying and scary” to see Star video and read the reports. She called the situation for animals in captivity “the wild west” and called on the province to regulate and oversee the treatment of marine mammals in Canada.

Finally, I was pleased to see my own local MPP, Lorenzo Berardinetti calling for a more “proactive” approach to conditions for animals in captivity, instead of the OSPCA’s complaint-based system.

He said that it’s worrisome in relation to whales and dolphins because “they’re extremely intelligent. They have self-awareness. If you put a mirror in front of them, (studies have shown) they recognize themselves.”

Now I want to see all these individuals - each representing one of our major parties - get together to fight for the rights of the animals of this province.

Ontario needs to WAKE up and start putting some serious legislation in governing how the animals of this province - domestic, farm and exotic - marine and non-marine - factory and NON- factory - are treated. 

And when CLEAR, unequivocal cases of animal abuse are revealed - as at Marineland this week - STOP dragging your damn feet and ACT. Those animals need help NOW. I don't want to see a committee struck, a task force assigned, - act NOW, act DECISIVELY AND QUICKLY. Get those animals some HELP

Marineland - Arena of Horrors

More than 25 years ago, some relatives arrived from Montreal and wanted to see Marineland.  What I saw that day traumitized me so much that I left within 2 hours and spent the next week phoning various government departments, the OSPCA and the Niagara Falls Humane Society- to find out THEN that there is absolutely NO ONE monitoring this place of torture and spiritual and mental prison for innocent marine animals.

The Toronto Star goes behind the scenes today and exposes the truth behind those light-hearted commercials (which i TURN OFF every time I hear them). 

Videos shot in 2011 and 2012 shows them writhing in pain or plunging their heads into a single bucket of clean water. Sandy often sits like a statue, dry as a bone. There’s no lens in Baker’s left eye. When a trainer put him back in the water in April, he barked and it flew out.

Dolphins in pens so filthy they can't be seen in water of such bad quality "Their skin fell off in chunks, their colour darkened and they refused to eat."

And there is NO ONE TO STOP THEM.  The government refuses to intervene. The OSPCA is NOwhere to be seen.

There are no government regulations for sea mammal captivity in Canada. The Canadian Association of Zoos and Aquariums, a self-regulating industry association, first licensed Marineland in 2007 and national director Bill Peters says there have been no complaints. Its licence was renewed for five years at the end of September 2011, after a summer inspection by a CAZA team of experts.

In 1998, Zoocheck clearly outlined the horrific conditions these animals were being forced to live in, day after agonizing day. And still nothing was done.

In that scathing report, Dr. Naomi Rose (HSUS) clearly states:

Their eyes appeared to be closed the entire time (it was difficult to see their left eyes at any time or either eye on the far side of the tank). The leading edges of their extremities (the dorsal fins, the pectoral fins, and the tail flukes) all had the same type of skin condition—flaky and blotchy. The trailing edges of the dorsal fins and tail flukes were ragged and tattered. The rest of their skin seemed in normal condition. Their dorsal fins leaned slightly. Their girths were robust (that is, they seemed overweight). The skin condition of their extremities and their closed eyes are consistent with water that is over-treated chemically, but this could not be confirmed.

Another expert, Doug Cartlidge relates other substandard, worrisome and inhumane conditions:

 

Sterile and barren conditions within all cetacean pools in this facility are a major area of concern. Failure to provide an environment which mirrors an animal's normal living conditions demonstrates either a lack of understanding or a total lack of concern for that animal's needs. Regulations within the UK clearly require zoos to ensure all animals are maintained in as near natural conditions as possible for each species held. Paragraph 11 of the SSS states: "Animal enclosures to be equipped, in accordance with the needs of the species in question…in the case of aquatic animals, materials such as weed, shingle etc., to aid and encourage normal behaviour patterns among them." Even if there are no regulations in force within Canada there is no excuse for failing to keep ANY animals in as near natural conditions as is possible; barren concrete cages went out with Victorian zoos.

Since its inception, Marineland has brutally and without conscience exploited sensitive, intelligent living creatures in the name of profit.  These animals live lives of despair and pain, physically, spiritualy and emotionally battered every moment of every day; relegated to horrific, unnatural living conditions, forced to perform unnatural acts, in pain, they are used to "entertain" the oblivious crowds.

Further, it is not only the marine animals suffering, but the deer, bears and other animals as well.

PLEASE boycott Marineland! 

I will follow up once I find out the best source to contact in terms of getting this place SHUT down and the animals moved to places where some quality of life will be achieved. 

Horror in Peterborough

Outrage and disgust abound in Peterborough, Ontario this week as four dogs were "rescued" from an ostensibly empty house - purportedly abandoned to fend for themselves for 6 long, agonizing weeks. The Peterborough Examiner has a rather (badly) written article on this here.

The group that purportedly "rescued" them is crying foul - and saying the Peterborough Humane Society was advised of the dogs' plight and refused to intercede despite repeated attempts to get them to go in and save these animals.

Unfortunately, the group which in the Peterborough Examiner called themselves Give A Dog A Second Chance, a Durham Region rescue shelter have a rather spotty history themselves. Original founder, Melita Ferrugia has been accused of a number of unsavoury practices  - (not proven insofar as I am aware but the burden of evidence is compelling) - from selling "rescued" puppies, unvetted (and often with illnesses including parvo and parasites), to ostensibly breeding her own dogs repeatedly to sell for inflated prices on kiiji and craigslist.  This blog here  lists a number of cautions about dealing with the self styled rescue group and in particular Melita.

I admit, it bothers me that the group still styles itself publicly as Give a Dog a Second Chance, yet when you click on a google link to a page under that name you get this.  Yes, a Doggie Day Care and Boarding Facility with "rescue dogs" (and some fairly illiterate writers incidentally).

This came to my attention when someone self-styled as Mel DeVille popped up on the Support Cheri Di Novo in Removing ALL Aspects of BSL Facebook page . 

Claiming first that the dogs were "three of these dogs are pit bull mixes, and need fostering.
two females, one male(who will be coming to stay with me)" and seeking donations a little further on in the conversation when clearly, as the article states,

The two males are a wirehair terrier and a teacup Chihuahua, while the females are a wirehair terrier and a pit bull/boxer mix.

 so ONE only was maybe, loosely, a pittie mix - hardly possible to mistake a wirehair terrier and a chihuahua as pit bull MIXES.

Of course, a little lower down the donation pleas come in..

A word of advice, people - REPUTABLE rescues will pretty well ALWAYS provide a direct link to the VET doing the actual vetting - thus ensuring the funds go directly where they are needed.  I have asked for the vet's name and the clinic name, so we'll see.

Further as i find out more.

HOWEVER, that aside, I have ALSO written the Peterborough Humane Society. As affiliates of the OSPCA with its bloated, outrageous and legal right to pretty well do as they wish, I have asked the Organization (a) if they knew of these dogs, and (b) if so, WHAT did they know?

In the article in the Examiner, it looks like the original owners were claiming to have been going in and feeding the dogs (an interesting read, follow the link and read the comments, quite a little firestorm happeneing).  I think it entirely possible they were NOT - and regardless, leaving dogs alone in their own waste without supervision, proper exercise and company is inexcuseable.

So, WERE the dogs abandoned as stated?

DID the Peterborough Humane Society know about this and deliberately refuse to get involved?

Lots and lots of questions... would love to hear from anyone that knows more about this tragic situation.

most of all, I would like to know those dogs are being seen by a vet.

If indeed they ingested drywall, wood and other materials, they should be in a clinic, being monitored on a 24 hour basis...

OSPCA RALLY- Newmarket - this Wednesday, June 22

The Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals is an anathema to animal rights.


They are self-serving, deluded, corporate pigs (no offense to pigs who are smart, intelligent and loving animals – but using this word in the colloquial sense) who see animals as an unfortunate side effect of their bloated organizational morass – and thus ultimately disposable.

The reality is the OSPCA KILLS the majority of the animals they purport to “save”.

The reality is that it is their right (thank you Liberal government for facilitating this gross miscarriage of justice) to decide whether an animal is being treated improperly and their RIGHT to walk in and take the animal. The fact that after STEALING the animal they then kill it is indisputable and there are many PROVEN cases of this occurring.

It has now been clearly established beyond doubt that the OSPCA – the same organization which has attacked and destroyed both individuals and organizations for the same reason – have clearly contravened policies and procedures set out by the College of Veterinarians.

Just a few of the contraventions are as follow:

• Inadequate record keeping of animals brought into the ospca Newmarket shelter.
• Inadequate record keeping of animals killed and/or euthanized;
• Inadequate record keeping of controlled drugs and medication;
• Absence of even the "Minimum Standard" for the care and compassion of animals as specified in the Animals for Research Act and the Pound Act;
• Inadequate training of supervisors and staff;
• Allowing the killing of animals to be carried out by staff and/or auxiliary personnel without direct or immediate supervision of a registered veterinarian;
• Inadequate performance and unacceptable services carried out regarding the most basic procedures

It would be ironic if it weren’t so heartbreaking that this bloated bureaucracy uses those same contraventions (often unsubstantiated) to harass and torment other individuals and organizations.

 

Premier Dalton McGuinty MUST immediately fire senior management Jim Sykes, Kate MacDonald, Tanya Firmage who have consistently, arrogantly and without conscience been caught out in lie after lie after lie.

 

In an independent review, J. Scott Weese, detailed failure after failure on the part of this nightmare for animals of an organization.

• Variable and sometimes contradictory statements.
• Content or factual errors.
• Inadequate consideration of many broad issues that contribute to infectious disease transmission.
• Inadequate provision of information to personnel for routine practices, health risks and disease control issues.
• Reliance on passive suggestions rather than firm requirements, such that much of the specific information in the documents can be interpreted as optional.
• Inadequate description and delineation of roles and responsibilities of different personnel, reporting mechanisms and the decision-making process for many important decisions.
• Excessive marginally relevant material that detracts from more important information.
• No indication of clear, formal, documented and mandatory training for most areas.

 I highly recommend interested persons read the report cover to cover , but some salient issues include the fact that there is “here is no formal mechanism for properly addressing outbreaks” – yet in their deluded, arrogant ‘wisdom’ they decided to MURDER all 350 animals in their facility last year at a purported – yes purported – it was LATER proven the “virulent strain of ringworm” they claimed justified the slaughter – NEVER EXISTED.  Further, as quoted from the Report: 

An additional concern with in-house testing is quality control. Improper use or interpretation of tests can lead to erroneous results being reported, as may have been the case in this ringworm 'outbreak' i.e. misinterpretation of the Fungassay screening test.

 Even the most basic requirements are flouted and “Currently, there is no requirement that animals be vaccinated against rabies prior to adoption.” This from an organization that purports to speak for the animals of ONTARIO?

 

This organization, which says styles itself the EXPERT on animal care, animal husbandry and animal welfare in the province of Ontario had as a directive to its employees instructions like:

For example, people are to "Walk through all rooms and ensure all dogs are ok ... .,

 OK? What in the name of GOD is OK? As in alive (possibly an important directive as the OSPCA is so keen to kill). Clean? Unstressed? Talk about vague and this from an organization which MAKES the directives and rules!

 

Kate the BITCH Macdonald and her minions lied outright in many of their dealings with the Toronto Humane Society last year. They lied about the “virulent ringworm” outbreak. There has been lie after lie to owners about their beloved pets which were summarily executed without even a chance to say goodbye. The lies are legion yet these people continue to rule.

 

What is wrong with the McGuinty government that they continue to allow this travesty of an organization to continue under the aegis of individuals who so clearly are liars, cheats and charlatans?

 

FIX this, McGuinty and FIX IT NOW.

 

Let our voices be heard at the highlest level of government; come to the Rally this Wednesday, June 22. 

 

 

Peaceful Protest at Newmarket OSPCA

WHEN:    THIS Wednesday, June 22, starting at 1400 hrs (2:00 p.m.)

WHERE:  Outside OSPCA Headquarters, 16586 Woodbine Avenue, Newmarket, ON

See Facebook details here.

An emphasis on the peaceful nature of this protest.  We are there to bear witness to the atrocities committed by the OSPCA and their management.  We are there to show the government and the people of Ontario that we remember.  We are there to be credible and sincere voices AGAINST the continuation of the OSPCA in its present guise under its present leadership.

Be there!! 

Class... let's have it tonight

The AGM is tonight, and I admit to some trepidation.  I'm not looking forward to the potential conflict that may arise as Trow et al. make their bid to regain control.

Regardless of any accusations, carrying-on, posturing or bankstanding, let those of us who really care about the future of the Toronto Humane Society keep our dignity and our control.

Do no feed into the frenzy I am sure he will try to generate.

Do not give into (very understandable) anger when accusations (unsubstantiated and unfounded) are claimed.

Let's just keep to business and do what we need to do.

Solidify the path on which the THS has taken some tentative steps this past year.

To clarify...

I think it somewhat obvious at this point, I am NOT a fan of the Trow crew.  Conversely, it is reasonable to assume I support the current Board including their recommended slate of characters.  I think it time to clarify where I stand.

First and foremost, I DO support the current Board with some reservations.  The reality is that for all my passion, I am hard-headed and practical.  Having had first-hand experience of the THS during the three years I volunteered as a dog walker - albeit I was not, of course, privy to the ins and outs of the financial or management issues - it was obvious to me that ego was driving the Shelter.  Without getting into details (which I've discussed at length elsewhere), the reality was that the ratio of animal to staff was simply not viable - not when you expected a humane, caring environment for the animals you took in. Further, there was a HUGE divide between what those of us in the trenches actually experienced and what was being vocalized by management.  Sometimes, I would read directives or articles and think, WOW, what shelter is THAT, not THIS one.

When the contemptible, politically corrupt and inhumane OSPCA made such a spectacular MESS of the "raid", things were bad - NOT as bad as the OSPCA eventually ensured it would become - mass euthanizations, rigid imposition of inhumane directives, the creation of what in essence became a police state - but a mess nonetheless.

When the dust settled and the new Board came in, I was THRILLED, but as much as I wanted things to change quickly, I am realistic enough to know that what I knew was simply the tip of the iceberg - that there were so many areas that had to be researched, fixed, explored and rebuilt that it was all going to take TIME.

A year has gone by (and my heart still aches at the murder of all the animals - especially those to whom many of us were so attached - we REMEMBER you Peti, Smokey, Socks, Captain, Tiger, and little Janey and there are tears in my eyes even now) and while the progress seems so slow that at times it is frustrating, I know that there is a massive amount of behind-the scenes work going on that is required and necessary in order to create a stable, solid foundation for the Toronto Humane Society.  I KNOW the Board has been working tirelessly, putting in long hours,

Having said that, there are still MANY changes that I (and I know many others) would like to see - when the dust settles next week it will be interesting to see the outcome.  But we all have a "bucket" of wishes and dreams and goals and here are a few items from mine - my vision of what i would like to see the THS become:

1.  I would like to see the THS become a no-kill shelter based on Winograd's very successful model - it can and has been done in many cities that have far more to deal with than Toronto.  Actually, addiing a link to Crystal's blog on this subject .... because she says it perfectly.

2.  In the short-term, though I will be PUSHING and VOCALIZING to Board members (given they get in) that the intake policy MUST change!!  Owners must be able to come in and surrender their animals without a burdensome, offputting demand for setting up appointments and then requiring TWO hours for each surrender.  The reality is that a conscientious owner brings an animal they can no longer keep to a shelter - BAD owners simply abandon them!  Making it difficult for people to surrender will deter many who do not have the time or are in situations that require immediate action. For owners that love their animals (because circumstances DO arise where loving people have to give up their pets) it is cruel - to find the courage to walk in then be told to come back. For others who simply want to dump their pet, being told to return at a specified time may result in the animal being abandoned, dumped or even killed. 

3.  Increased pressure on the City of Toronto to allow the THS to take in strays! The THS has always been a beacon to the animals of Toronto.  While I have a great deal of respect for what Toronto Animal Services is becoming (massive improvements there over the past several years), by nature they are what they are - a city service without the same amount of freedom somewhere like the THS is blessed with.  Irregularities, contravention of regulations, and a blatant disregard for the rule of law under the old guard meant the RIGHT to take in strays was lost under Trow (NOT, as claimed under the new Board).  The THS deserves to get it back - they have done what was required and more and the City must recognize that and allow them to do what they do BEST.

4.  The unfortunate reality is that the corrupt, inept and INHUMANE politically driven OSPCA controls who investigates cruelty. That is not only wrong it is criminal.  That NEEDs to change, so I am hoping that politically astute and well-connected Board members will step up to the plate and start pushing for changes that will allow more leeway and provide a broader directive from an organization OTHER than the OSPCA to appoint cruelty investigators.  The THS deserves to have its own investigators. It has had a sterling record in the past for exposing cruelty and should again be at the forefront as examples of organizations that care.

What I DO like and want to see continued and/or expanded are:

1.  The facilities!! They are FAR more animal-friendly, enriched and kinder.  Animals are provided not just with shelter but with environments that engage their health, mental, physically and emotionally. 

2.  The amazing new K9 department; enriched environments, training, socialization, dealing with behavioural and other issues - follow up after adoptions to ensure a smooth transition and a resolution of any adjustment issues.  Continued training of volunteers and staff to ensure a consistent and positive experience for the dogs and many other improvements.

3.  The cats!! So much happier now! No longer stacked like cordwood. Groomed and petted, played with and allowed to explore in a wonderful room, health monitored and cared for, more volunteers and more expertise so each kitty receives the maximum they can from their stay.

4.  The fast turnover in adoptions!!  They seem to barely get animals in before they're in new loving homes!

There are more... but a word to the Board members ... IF all goes well and the new Board is formed as myself and many others hope it will, don't get too comfy on your laurels.... a thorn called selkie is going to be poking your butts within short order ....

More on the candidates themselves later.

Dear Tony....

(Tony Marner is running for the Board of Directors of the THS on the Trow slate - members just received the third mailing from the Trow Group, this one from Tony and yeah, I'm thinking of all the money that COULD have gone to the animals) -

Letter from member, Doug Williams (my husband):

Dear Tony,

Maybe we should vote Trow.

As I have been at the new THS for the past several months on Sunday nights attending Sam Malatesta's class with our naughty rescue shepherd Llyr, I have seen SO many changes I am shocked and appalled.

You're RIGHT, they HAVE dismantled cages!  Now the dogs have WAY too much space!! Why, they even avoid the stress of being moved from kennel to kennel because they can be gently shooed in and the gate dropped so the cages can be cleaned without distressing them! Ridiculous!! It was FAR more effective when they were packed in like sardines!! Why there was nothing wrong with 90 lb dogs being confined for 23 out of 24 hours of every day in a cage they could barely turn in!  What is WRONG with that?

And yes, damn them! They turned E into a dog wellness training area!  My god, what will they think of next?  Socializing the dogs?  Teaching them basic manners!  I mean, after all, under Trow - dogs came in and were adopted out that had never walked on a leash, didn't know basic commands and so WHAT if they were quickly returned because of their lack of socialization! After all, they could then be adopted out AGAIN for more money!

And yes, you're RIGHT, THS under Trow took in ALL animals damn it! Whether they had the space or NOT!! So what if the cats languished in cages for YEARS ... they were ALIVE, weren't they?  What do you mean they need quality of life?  A little urine and feces never killed anyone (well, it might have but you didn't hear that from me - cleanliness and comfort are FAR too over-rated in my books).

I vaguely remember Sheenagh telling me about a K9 department that was briefly there during her earlier years walking - but Trow KNEW that ALL dogs should just be allowed to be who they were!!  I remember her telling me that he yelled at her one night to go the pace of the DOG (a 120 lb lab cross) - that she needed to RUN... the dogs were NOT to feel they were in any way being confined!!  THS dogs were going to be FREE like the wolves from which they were descended!! 

And after all, he labelled it didn't he? Saying coding the dogs so volunteers and staff knew what they were dealing with was 'prejudicial' to the dogs!! Ok, so it meant a lot of bites happened when people had NO idea what issues they were dealing with when they went to get the dogs (and yeah, so Sheenagh was almost mauled by a rottie that like the other dogs, had no history or indication of temperment - she survivied, didn't she?)  Wuss walkers!

Also, when I walk in on Sunday evenings, I sorta miss that overwhelming SMELL that used to permeate the hallways - it sorta meant "home" - well, let's face it, it WAS home for a LOT of animals after all that had been there for YEARS.

I know Sheenagh said staff was often almost non-existent and she and a lot of other volunteers would spend their time there trying to clean up the worst of the mess or hell, even water the dogs (spoiled canines!) - but after all LOVING animals is more important, right?

And let's face it the euthanasia rate was WAY lower - and yeah, I know, I know, so animals were found dead or suffered in their cages from lack of care - they were after all in a REFUGE.  Sheenagh remembers fondly camping out in a vet's office trying to get an old shepherd's ears syringed ... I bet she saw it as a challenge to get the old girl's very painful ear infection treated more than one day in a week!!  No more challenges now, is there?

We KNOW how much Tim loved the animals, why he HATED letting any of them go!! He knew he alone could 'care' for them the way they deserved .... that is why there were so many!!  Of course in  Trowville the fact that the staff to animal ratio was outrageously unbalanced was irrelevant, because in Trowville, ALL the animals were happy and grateful to be in this Paradise!!

AND, knowing that, Trow wisely worked ALONE. None of this ridiculous partnerships with Toronto Animal Services.  None of that nonsense with getting animals in and out and adopted quickly.  Hell, they even have a TOP notch K9 staff now - some of whom have been with the THS a very long time and are NOW being allowed to actually utilize their skills and expertise! What NONSENSE. 

Dogs should be allowed to be DOGS.  No rules. No manners. But able to exercise their will when and how they like!  That makes them happy, eh?  I know Sam says that leaves them anxious, confused and nervous, but what does he know!! He has only worked with dogs his entire life!

And after all, cats SLEEP most of the time, don't they? Why do they need exercise or socialization? Cats are anti-social anyways, right?  So now all this time is wasted, with things called 'enrichment' rooms, they get petted and brushed and played with - what a WASTE when they could be stacked in cramped cages, tier after tier - I remember seeing those when I picked up Sheenagh - it was cool - like a WALL of cats!

So, Tony, I can see why you want this ALL back!!

We'll have to think long and hard about this, won't we!

yours truly,


doug.

Just wanted to add (this is sheenagh) - that the staff that did survive management at the THS in those days were, in general, AMAZING.  They worked their fingers to the BONE, far exceeding their job descriptions, stayed late, came in early (no compensation), and along with volunteers, agonized and bled for the animals.  It was NEVER the staff that was an issue - it was the management.

Trow-isms....

The politicking is coming fast and furious as the countdown to the AGM ticks closer and closer. Lies, half-truths, histrionic outbursts of frenzied accusations - and that's just the letters that our apparently deep-pocketed former THS head sends. A walk around the web and his minions (anyone ever see Glory on the old Buffy series.. she had minions and that's who Trowoglites remind me of) and their hysterical outbursts based on nothing more than a blind allegiance to a tin pot dictator bleat the party line.


On the misnamed "Support the Animals" page we have an individual who is sadly devoid of balls (using the term euphemistically and in a non-gender specific way!) and hasn't the chutzpah to stand up and be counted, yet has the ‘courage’ to speak on behalf of the animals. Of course, that is in the World of Trow where every day is sunny and he rules like a benevolent god … perhaps our STA guys sees himself as the right hand man – a sorta of modern Jesus – although truth be told Jesus was never reticent about admitting who HE was.

With the mish mash of pseudo-information flying about, it is hard for anyone not directly involved with the Shelter to form an opinion. To that end, I thought I would address some of the accusations levelled against the NEW and IMPROVED THS in the hopes that the truth will be apparent. The questions below are a few of the more salient enquiries and the source of much of the Trowogolites bleating and whinnying.

1   .IS there a kitten-feeding program in effect right now (at the height of kitten time)- or NOT?
      If not, why not?

According to Board member and kitten feeder extraordinaire Jennifer Downe, yes, there is a kitten feeding program.

Our limitation is to get kittens from a. surrenders, b. from TAS. We can't accept a box of kittens that has been "found" as there is no ownership, and thus they are "stray". TAS is aware of our program and we are actively seeking to have them relinquish immature kittens. The volunteers have all been retrained as per the vet and technicians guidelines. We have a dedicated tech to support the kitten nursery. We have established a contract (terms of agreement) with TCR and ACR so hopefully this will lead to them giving us more kittens. THS has established space for +14 litters.

2. Why are there so FEW animals in the THS?

Actually, Interim CEO Christopher Barry answers it very well here on the THS blog.  If you don’t feel like reading it- in a nutshell, the shelter “The number of animals that THS can care for is based upon the Guidelines for Standards of Care in Animal Shelters produced by the Association of Shelter Veterinarians. That number for THS is 350 at any given time.”

Further,

We currently have approximately 300 animals in our care at the shelter. An additional 133 animals are in foster homes and will be returned to us as they become available for adoption. However, the number of animals we should be looking at is not the number of animals in the shelter, but the number of animals that go through the shelter and ultimately find forever homes. Since June 2010, we’ve helped approximately 2,500 animals.

So, first, there are LOTS of animals in the THS, many more that are in its care and responsibility just not physically in the shelter and most importantly, the turnover and adoption rate is so successful, the turnover is considerable.

Now the reason from THS President Michael Downey as to ONE reason why there are not as many the THS would in itself like:

As you know we cannot accept strays nor do investigations without being an affiliate of the OSPCA. This impacts intake. We are also seeing quite an improvement in turnover with dogs staying on average less than 5 days and cats less than 25. We have relationships with many shelters -dogs from Montreal is one I aware of where we are saving dogs - that is trying to feed our population. The quick turnover is a great sign because in the end we want forever homes for all this animals. But we do want more animals and management is constantly working on this issue.

3.    WHAT is the story on Dakota? Why did a letter go out stating he was in his home when he
       was sitting in a cage??

Mr. Downey provided a thorough and exhaustive explanation for the MIX-UP (which is what it was, not a wholesale attempt at deception) respecting Dakota. I would be more than happy to forward the entire explanation but in the interests of space restraint, here are the highlights:

• The Board believed Dakota was in his new home. Communication fell through before they were apprised of the delay.

• Step 1 – a realistic plan was created

• Step 2 – delay in conferring with the vet and the medication he was being assigned.

• Step 3 – the medication administered and then the cat had to be assessed for the effects of it

• Step 4 – Dakota received his foster check-up, bloodwork

• Step 5 – Dakota’s results came back and he was released to his foster to adopt home

4.   What is being done to fundraise/prepare for a low cost spay/neuter clinic?
      other than the Pepsi challenge?

Mr. Downey indicated that approximately $30-35,000 has been raised to date for the SN clinic . Due, however, to numerous factors including good fiscal guardianship, there is a necessity to ensure inflows match outflows. Mr. Downey further indicated that due to the chaos and negativity resulting from the allegations, evidence and erosion of faith resulting from an exposure of the realities of the shelter under Tim Trow, there is a LOT less money pre-OSPCA raid.

He indicated that the Board has been actively been seeking donations and gifts but there is a definite indication that many individuals who would otherwise donate are hesitant due to the continued uncertainty facing the THS. Thanks Tim, your egotistical, overweening desire to rule continues to derail a solid and real future for the THS.

5.    Has there been a higher incidence than normal of staff quitting? If so, are the reasons
      similar      (i.e. unhappy with management, dissatisfied with policy, etc).

To his knowledge, there is no unusual movement of staff. One staff member moved on because she was worried about the treat of Trow the Terrible returning. She indicated to Mr. Downey it was not a question of money.

I will interject here from my own PERSONAL experience while at the THS as a volunteer for close to three years.  In that period of time- under Trow - I myself witnessed MASS firings at least three times.  At times, volunteers (the few of us that managed to survive the machinations and tantrums and managed not to impale ourselves on the egos) scrambled to take care of animals as we would walk in and find ACWs slashed by two-thirds or more on more than one occasion.

6.    What about volunteers? A little bird tells me volunteers are being made to feel unwelcome
       or being discouraged? I am pretty certain this is BS as I know several and they haven't
       mentioned it, but need something solid.

Again, the Board members I spoke to have no knowledge of dissatisfaction or discouragement of volunteers. As I am in frequent contact with many currently actively volunteering, I would have to concur. In actual fact, one reason I have not felt compelled to return too quickly is because I am well aware that there are actually so many MORE volunteers than when I was there for three years. For those readers who care, I have not returned since the raid due to a severe injury I received last June and from which I am still recovering (the type that ended up with me in a wheelchair for 5 months).

___________________________________________________________________

So, there you have it - straightfoward answers to straightforward questions.

Not rocket science.

No attempt to obscure, dissimulate or spin.

Based on facts, real figures and honesty - you know, the NEW THS versus the old....

Oh.. and a final word from my husband who is currently attending Sam Malatesta's Sunday night dog training class at the THS with our bad shepherd Llyr .... "you know what I notice? the place doesn't STINK any longer ...."

Open Season on Toronto Animals... Torontonians .. you NEED TO BE HEARD

First, we have the threatened derailment of the emergence of a new and improved THS with the shrill, self-righteous lies and half-lies of the Trow crowd as he seeks to reestabilsh his fiefdom.

Second, we now have Ford Nation beginning its swatch of destruction to City Services.  As wrong as it seems, the welfare, care, adoption and shelter of Toronto's animals are under their aegies.  With an estimated budgetary shortfall of more than $700 million, Ford et al. will be frantically searching for ways to cut budgets.  Fred of Pound Dogs says it very well here.  Social Mange also sounds the alarm here.  I URGE you to check out these blogs (particularly Fred's) for some crucial information.

The reality is that the LAST place that people should look for cutbacks and changes are Toronto Animal Services.  That last few years have seen some radical changes to the potential fate of Toronto's animals.  From the horror at the THS to the arrogant mishandling still being exhibited by the OSPCA, oddly, a beacon for change for the good has been Toronto Animal Services.

There is no question that I, together with many others, would love to see TAS adopt a "no-kill" philosophy- it can and has been successfuly achieved by cities from larger than our own.  However, that aside, I have very favourably impressed with the positive changes I have seen over the past many years.

I was told, many years ago when I got my first dog, that TAS at that point sold dogs (and other animals) to research faclities (if I am wrong, please advise)  - a horror no animal should have to experience but somehow worse for animals accustomed to being cherished and loved by their humans.  My Lass would have been the perfect candidate. The larger size preferred (a collie/shephard) mix, docile, sweet and submissive, she was a research scientist's dream subject.  Instead, we adopted this emaciated, frightened little girl- then 3 years ago and a pathetic 44 lbs (her "good" weight was around 75) and loved her to distraction for the next 13 years.  One day, when I can write without crying every moment, I will write about my Lass.

TAS back then was basically a clearing house ... euthanasia rates were out of sight (but keeping in mind that at that time - around 1990, even the THS euthanized every 3 days!!).  The "pounds" were rudimentary and the care given minmal.  City workers with no experience but based on seniority tended creatures that deserved and needed care and knowledgeable hands.

For many years now there has been an incredible change in philosophy.  The emphasis has gone from seeing animals as a commodity, in many ways an inconvenience to the City, and become instead, individuals working within the system with compassion, knowledge and caring.    The facilities are so much more animal- friendly, and animals that once would have had no chance due to health, behavioural or emotional issues are, on many occasions, given that extra chance.

I know animal control officers that bring home sick kittens, help rehab dogs, create a rich, fulfulling atmosphere for the animals under their care.

These officers have already had their shifts cut.

Now Ford is suggesting a privitized animal control is preferable.

Has anyone read the newspapers recently?

Think Berger Blanc... the profit-based corporation which deals with Montreal's animals - horribly, cruelly and without mercy.  There is nothing special about this organization, nothing outstanding or unusual - it is in fact, exactly what it purports to be - PROFIT-BASED.

(see the Facebook page on this organization or see Fred's blog for an excellent (yet horrific) interview on investigations that have recently revealed horrors within the walls of that place). The montrealdogblog covers it extensively).

The reality is that when profit enters into the picture- compassion and caring become bottom line commodities.  When it is all about the numbers, feeling, caring, helpless animals merely become ink on a page.    Lives which could enrich and enhance instead become liabilities.

Make yourself heard.

Register here for the information meetings on the subject and make yourself heard (you must sign up if you wish to attend - PLEASE ATTEND).

At a minimum, take a few minutes and fill out this online survey to tell City Hall YOUR Toronto does not include making animals a commodity ...

(thanks Fred, for the links).

Please make yourselves heard... the animals of Toronto need you.

Rebutt... Rebuke.... REFUSE... or storytelling 101 by Tim Trow - UPDATED

The letter below was recently sent to the membership list of the Toronto Humane Society. As per his usual, Tim Trow makes outrageous, untruthful allegations based on nothing more than his own flawed opinion and obsessive desire to wrest control yet again.  Tim's letter is in italic. My rebuttals are in bold.

Dear Friend,



You will have been as distressed as I was to read the horrific newspaper reports about two cats whose right eyes had been poked out. A third had his teeth smashed. They were left to die in a dumpster.


The good news is that they were rescued and taken to the Bay Cat Hospital. There, a dedicated and skilful vet saved these brave animals, who were already purring and playing as they recovered from their surgery.


Toronto Animal Services found the guardian of one of them. The other two have already found good homes. This was truly a tragic story with a happy ending after such a terrible ordeal.


Then I realized: "Where was The Toronto Humane Society?" After all, the Bay Cat Hospital is only a few blocks from the THS shelter at 11 River Street, but we weren’t there.


This is the even greater tragedy - that The Toronto Humane Society has abandoned its rescue program. All of the uniformed rescue officers have been fired. Sadly, The Toronto Humane Society no longer cares for these animals who need you and me the most.

Under Toronto by-laws, Toronto Animal Services is responsible for taking in strays and the THS’ right to do so was removed. HOWEVER, TAS and the THS have been working towards the same goals and as such, work together to give every animal the opportunity to a new and happy life. Animals are exchanged between the two organizations based on which organization looks like it would be best suited to deal with that animal’s needs.

The Etobicoke Humane Society also is an OSPCA affiliate, Apparently, they have OSPCA-sanctioned volunteer cruelty investigators who are limited to the boundaries of the former borough of Etobicoke.

Sadly, under the auspices of former President Tim Trow, the right to investigate animal-related issues was removed by the OSPCA which dictates who and what organizations are legally allowed to conduct investigations. Uniformed rescue officers were not “fired” by the Toronto Humane Society; rather, they lost their legal status due to what was considered gross negligence and a lack of accountability under Trow.

Further, the right to handle wildlife was ALSO revoked under the previous management:


VP Marcie Laking said in a Star interview last year “The natural resources ministry shut it down during Trow’s tenure and the issue is before the courts, she said. “ this is verifiable and fact.

Since I wrote to you recently, I have received numerous telephone calls, letters and emails and I have learned much more about the true state of The Toronto Humane Society.


You may remember that I mentioned in my last letter the rumours about a possible appraisal and sale of the shelter. Well, an appraisal is a fact. And the shutting down and sale of the shelter has been discussed at the Board.


I have been assured that there are NO plans to shut down 11 River Street. An appraisal is simply good business sense and has no bearing on whether or not the building was going to be sold. The new Board has a fiscal responsibility to get their house in order.

Further, according to a Board member, she is not aware of any appraisal. The staff have, however, been reviewing maintenance/upkeep needs for the building which were grossly neglected under Tim Trow’s management.

We know that the Board has already closed the North York Adoption Centre for good. I'm sure that they will deny that any decision about the shelter has been made. But why else would they reduce the number of animals being cared for from over a thousand to a couple of hundred? And once a decision is made, and we learn of it, it will be too late to change.


The reality was that with a misguided sense of compassion, a hoarder mentality was woefully prevalent in the THS. There is NO kindness in taking in thousands of animals when the quality of care that was able to be provided was sorely lacking. Dogs were unsocialized, under-exercised and had no access to quality of life. Kennels have been reconfigured so that dogs now have twice the space they were accorded before. Further, the gates between these larger kennels, mean dogs experience less stress as they can be gently herded into the other side while the alternate side is cleaned, instead of being constantly moved from kennel to kennel. Dogs seek stability and having a place they recognize as “theirs” is crucial to a healthy mindset.

Further, one of the former kennels has been ripped out and the room reconfigured as a K9 wellness centre. Here, trained staff and volunteers work with a highly qualified K9 co-ordinator to teach dogs how to interact in a healthy and well socialized manner with people. Providing dogs with good socialization, teaching them basic commands, making them comfortable in a variety of environments is immensely helpful in ensuring that once adopted, the adoption is successful. 

Maxx (a stray from TAS) is a great example of this.  A volunteer dog walker is taking him to highly acclaimed trainer Sam Malatesta's class currently taking place on Sundays in the THS and he's a changed dog.   Several other dogs have attended the class and have since been adopted.

K9 Manager Shas is also doing in-house training with dog owners to keep dogs in their homes (ie. deal with the issue rather than surrendering or returning the dog)

Cats were in a very bad place.  They would go weeks without anyone visiting them other than to clean their cages.  “With only 8 cat volunteers and 800 cats, you can do the math.” a Board member and volunteer said.

The cattery is vastly improved. Yes, there are less cats. However, now the cats are provided with ample opportunity to exercise, interact and socialize not only with other cats but with human beings. Volunteers and staff have time and skills to work with the cats and ensure that they are having a positive and stimulating stay in the Toronto Humane Society. Human interaction, close attention to individual temperaments, interaction and play time all contribute to a vastly superior quality of life compared to being stacked like cordwood in small 2 x 2 ft cages with NO opportunity to explore, exercise or interact.

Communal rooms under the old THS were inaccessible and difficult for people to even see in before, so no incentive to adopt those cats.  The hygiene of the rooms was horrific under the old management.  At one point there were 20 cats in the FIV room in a room the size of a work cubicle.  Now the cats each get a visit once a day – at least!

The small animal room has also been completely renovated with serious attention paid to creating proper habitats and positive interactions for the various species. Animals are now on a far superior diet with close attention paid again to socialization and proper health.

Friends, we can't let them close The Toronto Humane Society.


There is NO question the THS is to be closed. Further, several plans are in the works to enhance and expand their purview, including negotiations to re-establish the right to take in strays, efforts to raise funds for a low cost spay/neuter clinic and continued creation of positive relationships with various breed rescues and other animal care organizations.

As I write, the shelter has been essentially emptied. The lost and found are taken to City pounds. Cages have been demolished. The CatSkyHouse is eerily quiet. A handful of dogs brought in from Quebec masks the reality of the nearly empty shelter. For the first time in Society history the frightened, the elderly, the sick, and the tiniest of kitten orphans, have had their right of entry snatched from them.

First, the THS and Toronto Animal Services have established a close and positive working relationship. There is interaction and reciprocal movement between the two organizations. Depending on the animal, there is collaboration on where the best placement would be for that particular animal – where it would have the greatest chance of being adopted.

The THS is also actively working towards the establishment of positivem, reciprocal relationships with breed rescues and plans are in the offing to bolster and expand its foster care program. There is no question that the optimum place for any animal to live is NOT a shelter. At-risk animals, whether due to temperament, emotional or health issues thrive best when moved to appropriate rescues or foster homes where they can get the best care possible. The THS keeps in close touch with their current foster homes and monitor where their animals are placed and regular follow-up and checks are made to ensure that the placements are working well both for the animals and their sponsors.

So what is the response of the Board to this shameful record? Not surprisingly, it's to try to change the rules to keep them in control. You've heard about new by-laws Board Chair Linda McKinnon is proposing. Here are just a few of the changes they haven't told us about:

The Board can appoint an unlimited number of new, non-voting but full Board members without member approval;

According to a Board member,



(1) any proposed by-law amendments were brought to the Board from the governance committee that was open for any member to join.


(2) A summary of all proposed amendments are being sent to the members with their AGM invites and the actual proposed amendments are available upon request to members for review prior to the AGM


(3) proposed amendments are not designed to keep anyone out but are about making the bylaws current, ie. gender-neutral wording, in line with the Corporations Act, and in keeping with recent case law related to the London Humane Society case, AND


(4) the proposed bylaw amendments will be voted on by the members, not just the Board at the AGM with the members having been informed by the mailing. There was NO ATTEMPT to “sneak” things through with the general proxy tactics Tim used to use.


Lastly, the Board member indicated she was unaware of any proposed amendment about appointing non-voting Board members – what would be the point (or impact for that matter?!) of that?


Board members can be proposed at the Annual Meeting. This means that if you can't attend in person and are voting by proxy, you won't know who all the candidates are;

There have been no changes to how Board members can be elected other than to open up nominations to all members.  The current Board will indicate on the mailing which of the candidates they support, but it is STILL the membership who decides to elect who they see fit.


Board and committee meetings used to be open and transparent. Now Board members will be prohibited from telling us what happens at their meetings. Volunteers will be silenced as well.

Unlike when Tim held Board elections, candidates were provided with an opportunity to be included in the mailing with a biography. Under the bylaws, anyone who submits an application up until (not sure of exact timing) 2 weeks prior to the AGM can run – but more time was needed to get the mailing out to the members prior to the AGM. Hence the fact that SOME candidates may not make it into the mailing, but they are still able to run. A HUGE step up from the last Tim AGM where the members had to REPEATEDLY ASK during the meeting who was even up for election!



The current Board is VERY transparent – they currently post their minutes on the website which had never been done.

Tim’s remarks here would almost be amusing if they weren’t so outrageous. The reality is that Board meetings under his reign were travesties. He is excellent at schmoozing people and would collect a huge amount of proxies (his preferred way of running things). Individuals who disagreed were usually allowed any time to state their objections and his belligerent, often frightening demeanour, yelling and refusal to allow a civilized debate seldom ensured a balanced meeting. “Open” and “transparent” are the LAST way I would describe former Board meetings.

Fortunately, there is a solution.


You and I can vote down this distraction from animal care. That’s why I hope that your membership is up-to-date. And please tell your friends who are members about this critical vote.


For over a century, The Toronto Humane Society has been a refuge for all animals. Those who came before us battled against cruelty. We have always been a shelter for the most vulnerable. We can be that place again. We cannot abandon the three cats I told you about and so many others. They need us.


And we certainly cannot tolerate a near empty shelter.


I have been speaking with members and friends of The Toronto Humane Society. I know that we all want it to succeed and that’s why I’m so gratified that you have shared your ideas to make The Toronto Humane Society great again. I will be discussing and sharing these ideas with you before the upcoming Annual Meeting.


Please join with me as you have before to make The Toronto Humane Society the leader in caring for all animals. They need us like they’ve never needed us before.


With best personal regards,

Tim, if you TRULY cared about the Toronto Humane Society you would be aware that your name is synonymous with dysfunctional.

The manner in which your staff was treated was beyond anything I, as a volunteer, had ever experienced in any environment.  Yelling, browbeating, dismissal and threats were common.

Further, your egocentric form of management resulted in the OSPCA having the power to walk in and destroy many of the animals you purportedly “saved”. Had you not obviously, consciously and arrogantly flaunted the untenable situation you created within the walls of 11 River Street, the OSPCA would never have had the authority to do what it did. The fact that they acted like complete cretins and in turn, flaunted the rule of law themselves (thus ensuring that pretty well all charges were dropped and actually never made it to Court due to gross errors in the way they exercised warrants and conducted themselves), is moot.


You had your day.


In actual fact, I have said and will say again, many of your visions were excellent – it was just when your ego got in the way that they got distorted and twisted.


It is time to move on.


For the Toronto Humane Society to take a new, wonderful direction which will in fact (and is) fulfilling many of the dreams you yourself had and for YOU, to realize that your day is DONE and if you really care as you say you do, WALK AWAY.

Say it ain't so, Trow ....

Once upon a time there was a man with what many felt was a soft heart. A great BIG cushy heart that loved animals – all animals – loved them to distraction. This man no doubt meant well – but what this man didn’t get is that loving animals extravagantly, loving animals passionately, loving animals to the point where balance, compassion, understanding and awareness are no longer part of the equation really isn’t loving at all – it is obsession.

It is hoarding.

It is narcissism to the highest degree.

For it is sad, but true, that sometimes in loving, we have to let go. True courage and a strong, enduring love give us the strength to recognize our limits. It gives us the courage to know what is best for the animal – not what is easier on our hearts or our own selfish needs.

It describes a man who is a genius at  manipulation.

Whose obsession continues after 20+ years to the extent that rather than allow the THS to blossom as it should ... rather than allow the new, strong THS to grow, his selfish, self-serving, obsessive need to dictate and control are making him take a yet another run for the Board of this beleaguered organization.

Still reeling from the allegations and mismanagement under his reign, the THS is only now beginning to become what it was meant to be.

This man claims to be the voice for the animals.

I wonder who spoke for Diva as she lay dying in her kennel?

I know a volunteer did – begging that a kind word, warm hands and a compassionate needle would release her from her torment. Instead, big hearted Trow who “loved” animals so much refused permission for compassionate euthanasia (for a dog riddled with cancer and dying in pain).

Who spoke for the cats stacked row on row on row, huddled in small dirty cages, sitting in their own feces and urine, desperate to stretch and play and jump as cats should. Yet there they sat, week after interminable week.

Because this man’s “big” heart said he couldn’t say no. This man’s heart said the THS could handle it.

But it couldn’t.

Need volunteers? Caring, compassionate hands to nurture and pet and hold with tenderness and care even for a moment those poor cats? No, according to Mr. Trow, there were “more than enough”. I know because two of my daughters sought to be volunteers twice over the course of a year and were told no volunteer positions were available … there were “more than enough”.

And so the cats sat. Unseen. Uncared for other than the basics of food and sometimes water. No tender hand. No brush along rough fur. No interaction.

While those who loved them, those who cared passionately about them, those that stayed despite all, ran themselves ragged trying to give compassion to far too many.

I remember a long, brutally hot summer when the heat beat down like punishment on the pristine grass which Mr. Trow insisted be laid each Spring. A summer when one of a series of firings of ACWs and staff that I personally experienced left kennels bursting with needy dogs. Dogs with issues. Dogs with no outlet for their boundless energy. No opportunity to spend any but a few stolen moments relieving themselves outside.

A summer when arriving for my early morning shift to walk, instead I spent several hours just filling empty water bowls. Over and over. Because there were no people you see to deal with all these dogs and while the staff that remained had huge hearts and cared desperately, few hands can only accomplish so much.

I remember filling those bowls over and over … finishing the rows upon rows of kennels only to start again as the desperately thirsty animals had already finished what I had poured.

Volunteers and sadly depleted staff would scuttle along the corridors of the THS, frantic to relieve for a moment the awful tedium of a pointless existence for the animals trapped within its confines … heads down, keeping ourselves small and non-offensive.

Because narcissism demands an audience.

Self-obsession and an unshakeable belief in your own inalienable right to make every decision require instant obedience.

Why did we stay?

Because when all was said and done, those few of us that survived those years, did so because we felt the animals were better off with us there rather than not.

We stayed because at its core, without the burden of a super-ego and a man who thought himself God, the core values were right. Which makes it sadder – that his vision in many respects was wonderful – it was just in the doing that his ego took precedence.

The THS has been, was, and will again be the voice of the animals.

It should and will stand as a beacon for the unwanted, the neglected, the lost, the hurt and the needy.

If Tim Trow TRULY loved the animals he wouldn’t now be running for the Board together with his cohorts and minions.

If Tim Trow TRULY cared about the future of the THS he would accept his defeat with dignity and stand down.

If Tim Trow TRULY cared about the animals he purports to “love’ he would accept that the direction the THS is now taking is what is right and best for the animals.

But he doesn’t.

His ego, his sense of self-entitlement, his obsessiveness and need to control supersede the reality of a thriving THS.

Because it is, in the end, all about Tim.. not the animals.

UPDATE: As of yesterday, Venus has found a home!!!!

This beautiful girl has finally been given her chance - THANK you to the people who saw in her what many of us had seen for years - a loving, caring, loyal and passionate spirit.  Be happy, little girl.

Home

The ache for home lives in all of us, the safe place where we can go as we are and not be questioned.

Maya Angelou

Venus.

Betrayed. Abandoned. Abused. and yet she hopes.

Perhaps one of the most astonishing charactertiscs about dogs are their endless ability to believe.  To come back from loss and betrayal, to find it in their great big hearts to believe yet again that THIS time, THIS time, the boundless faith and loyalty that lies at their soul will, THIS time, be recipricoated. Be appreciated. Be LOVED.

This 7 year old shepherd cross is understandably hesitant to trust yet trust she does - given time and patience she has shown that despite the hurt she has experienced over her life, you can see in her big dark eyes the ability and the will to love again. A favourite of the Toronto Humane Society dogwalkers, many of whom have known her (sadly) through her several other times at the THS, with the people she trusts, Venus blossoms.

Although a shepherd/lab x, Venus is all german shepherd in personality. Intensely loyal, incredibly committed and loving, shepherds are not kissy face clown labs, nor wiggling "love me" golden retrievers. They are intelligent, strong-willed and profoundly loving.  The right owner, with patience and understanding, would have in this beautiful dog a lifetime companion whose sweet personality would blossom once she internalized that THIS time was for keeps. She simply needs to believe that everything she offers would be embraced and repricrocated.  Venus desperately wants a leader and a guardian.

Because she grew up in unstable, insecure circumstances, Venus is sometimes a bit anxious around some strangers and dogs. She has worked hard to achieve confidence, having attended outside training classes with one of the THS volunteers, as well as receiving ongoing help from THS staff.  As a bonus, to help her settle and thrive in her new environment, Venus' new guardian will get free training/support for as long as needed from THS K9 department.


Venus is a healthy, young-at heart girl with many years ahead of her. She is energetic, playful and with the right person, so eager to please and to do well.

Dear Venus deserves a chance at a home of her own. Though well-loved at the Toronto Humane Society, well-cared for and cherished, she needs and deserves that someone special who will recognize and embrace the wonderful dog she is.

Where thou art, that is home.

Emily Dickinson

You can find Venus here.

Good things shaking down at 11 River Street with the THS

As noted in the blog preceding this, I am cognizant that there is lots GOOD happening at the THS and Red Star Cafe  does her usual awesome job summing it up.

I am not out to "get" the THS; rather, I yearn for what many animal lovers yearn for, I ache for what I KNOW many Board members passionately believe in, I BELIEVE it can happen with the dedication, the drive, the desire and the good will of staff, management, vets, board members and most of all, the PEOPLE in this City who for so many years have BELIEVED that every animal has a chance.

To that end, SUPPORT the new Toronto Humane Society in becoming the BEST it can be - a beacon and an example for a humane society that exemplies Nathon Winograd's no-kill movement.

As Red Star relates below in her always articulate words....

The Toronto Humane Society invites you to a lively evening of Cuban music, dancing, snacks and mojitos at the Boulevard Club on the lakeshore. The event takes place on Monday, September 13.

Please come out and support THS as it moves forward with projects to help the animals, including the building of a high-volume spay/neuter clinic for the urban Toronto community at River Street, alliance with Toronto Animal Services and cat rescues for trap/neuter/return of feral cats, re-opening of the kitten nursery, and improved socialization and training of dogs to help them get adopted into loving homes. THS is also consulting with Bill Bruce, director of Calgary Animal Services, to learn about the successful Calgary model of no-kill sheltering. Bill attended Hershey’s Rally to oppose breed-specific legislation this past weekend with THS volunteers and members of the board.

THS is funded entirely by members and donors, but donations are down this year. These good people need your help to continue to work for the animals and the community.

If you aren’t able to make it to the Cuban Dance Party, please consider donating online or by snail mail to THS. If you are specifically interested in supporting the spay/neuter clinic, just indicate on your cheque that the donation is “for spay/neuter clinic only” and your funds will be earmarked.

Anatomy of a Death: Why did Icy Die?

The issue of euthanasia is fraught with controversy and passion and inevitably gets mired in personal beliefs and subjective notions on when and why an animal should die. The College of Veterinarians of Ontario (the “CVO”) recognizes to a limited extent (my emphasis) the dilemma faced by many vets and published Guidelines on Veterinary Euthanasia (the “Guidelines”) in October 2008 (on its website).

Under the Law

A spokesperson for CVO (“Fischer”) recently indicated to me in response to an email I sent with a number of questions respecting the practice of euthanasia a number of helpful links and with specific reference to vets employed by humane societies or shelters .

The unique position of a veterinarian employed by a humane society or shelter is addressed through a provision of the OSPCA Act, and more specifically in the Veterinarians Act/Loi sur les veterinaries R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 1093 (the “Act”):

43(2) (4) A member may practice veterinary medicine as,

(a) …

(e) an employee of a humane society operated in accordance with the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act if, in the course of the employment, the member provides professional services under a written contract that provides that the member is responsible for all decisions relating to the quality and promotion of the member’s professional services and the health of the subject animals;
(my emphasis)

I want to point out here the words in the proviso “health of the subject animals” – so this provision does not deal directly with the reasons for euthanasia but rather could be construed to refer to (in the CONTEXT of euthanasia), the health of the animal.

Further, the Act states in Section 43:

(3) For the purposes of subsection (2),

(a) …

(b) a member employed by a humane society operated in accordance with the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act or by a pound operated under the Animals for Research Act who performs a veterinary service for an animal seized by, or irrevocably surrendered to, the society or pound shall be deemed to perform the service to his or her employer. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 1093, s. 43 (3).

(4) A member may practice veterinary medicine as,

(a) …

(e) an employee of a humane society operated in accordance with the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act if, in the course of the employment, the member provides professional services under a written contract that provides that the member is responsible for all decisions relating to the quality and promotion of the member’s professional services and the health of the subject animals;
(my emphasis)

Again, to me, when exploring the rationale behind euthanizing an animal, Subsection 43(4)(e) again refers to the member being responsible for “all decisions relating to the quality and promotion of the member’s professional services and the health of the subject animals”. No doubt there are those that can read that provision as encompassing almost autonomous powers to the vet, but again, to me, it more clearly refers to “health” of the subject animals which does not rationalize the euthanasia of a healthy dog or cat!

So those provisions deal with the legalities. Specifically, it clearly states that while the shelter is the veterinarian’s employer, said employer cannot under the law interfere with the vet’s decision with respect to the health of the animal. I do NOT believe it necessarily codifies the vet`s complete and utter right to make unilateral decisions about anything OTHER than the medical condition and health of the animal. Specifically, it does not as far as I can see give any vet the unilateral right to euthanize an animal based on behavior, age (given the animal is healthy) or other factors apart from and separate from HEALTH issues.

The employer/member conflict which this law was designed to avoid is alleged to have occurred under the auspices of the previous Board and President Tim Trow. I do have to ask, if indeed that WAS the case where WAS the CVO during the MANY years Mr. Trow spearheaded the organization and ostensibly dictated to Shelter vets how do to do their job?

Medical versus Subjective Reasons for Euthanasia

But while those provisions deal with the legalities, they do NOT address specifically what set of factors determine an animal SHOULD be euthanized. Because the reality is, it is not a straightforward.

I think it inarguable that a vet can and SHOULD have the final say if there are clear cut and solid medical reasons why the animal should be euthanized. Inoperable tumors, degenerative diseases that have or are reaching a critical stage, continuing pain which cannot be alleviated, animals who have had accidents where it is impossible to provide a reasonable guarantee of quality of life.

BUT, and this is a HUGE caveat – euthanasia is not always about putting an animal out of pain or humanely assisting it to die.

The reality is that medical issues are FAR from the only reason an animal is euthanized. In actual fact, it is highly likely that in our society among the many shelters, humane societies, pounds and other organizations that deal with the sad reality of abandoned, neglected and abused pets – it is probably the LEAST likely reason in those settings.

In exploring the issue of euthanasia in a shelter setting, I continually came across well-meaning individuals who harbour an unrealistic and unsubstantiated belief that vets are vets because of their deep and enduring love of animals.

As in any profession, I think the actualities are far different. I believe some vets do take up the profession because of their love of animals; equally I believe there are as many that enter it due to the lucrative nature of the practice. Add to that the vast differences in philosophy, outlook and viewpoints among vets (who are all individuals after all) - and what is considered a “legitimate” reason for euthanasia becomes problematic and impossible to agree upon.

CVO Guidelines

I have provided a link to these Guidelines but there are a few pertinent points I want to make. As noted before, these guidelines take into account the unique relationship between a veterinarian who is employed by a humane society or shelter.

However, having noted that, the Guidelines can and do apply to that scenario as well. Under the sub-heading “Client Preparation”, the CVO clearly urges a dialogue between the shelter and/or humane society (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Client”) and the veterinarian to minimize “the chance that the owner’s values will diverge from the veterinarian’s when a decision needs to be reached regarding an animal’s situation.”

That clearly indicates that a decision on euthanasia is not a unilateral one but one that requires communication and discussion between all parties who are at law and morally, responsible for the animal in question.

Also noteworthy is the Guidelines’ advice respecting Client Support- something that was sadly and tragically absent from the Toronto Humane Society during the past several months. Animals, some of them long-term members of the THS, much beloved and cosseted by staff and volunteers were summarily executed with NO chance for goodbyes or intervention and absolutely no sympathy for the resultant agony of mind and spirit on the part of those who loved them.

But, in the context of who decides whether an animal lives or dies, the Guidelines clearly favour:

Communication between and among veterinarians and staff…. to ensure that the veterinary team is clear on its policies and procedures, so that consistent information is given to clients. Practitioners should maintain a euthanasia policy within their practices that clearly outlines the position of the practice and/or the veterinarians who work there. This policy should be developed and periodically reviewed with staff and made available to all clients at an $appropriate point in the VCPR.

Which leads us rather elegantly to the next consideration .

The THS in Flux

Under the former management of the THS, euthanasia was not only a last resort but misguided “compassion” resulted (alleged but more than likely true) in the cruel and unnecessary suffering of animals that should have been provided a dignified and kind way out of their pain and suffering. To date, under the auspices of executive director Garth Jerome, the new “THS” describes itself as “low-kill”. The current Board appears to concur, however, that a change in policy to a “no-kill” is hopefully in the offing. (I would also point out that from Mr. Jerome’s email and his willingness to work with the new Board, he appears to be open to change).

However, as things stand at the moment there is no appreciable movement toward a no-kill policy in the THS. More worrisome is the continued lack of transparency as to the policies, decisions and procedures actually implemented at the time.

In early July, two Siberian huskies – a bonded pair – were surrendered to the THS. Due to extenuating circumstances and the last minute failure of a foster home, their owner Steve N. had no choice but to surrender them – and in the full belief they would be safe – he did so to the THS. Within HOURS of their arrival, Icy was euthanized. To date there has been NO explanation as to why nor have the THS staff, Board or management owned up as to who made the decision.

I know there is a tremendous amount going on behind the scenes at the THS. The reality is that there are contracts, legalities and no doubt, a jockeying of position as individuals and groups seek to come to terms with a radically different reality within the walls of 11 River Street.

I also know that NO ONE has admitted to making the decision to kill Icy (and other animals) – yet someone DID kill her – and while no one is saying whom, it did happen.  I do not believe – and feel that most rational people would concur – that any ONE individual (or collective group of individuals such as vets, management, staff etc) has the right, the rationality, the expertise or the perspective to decide which animal lives or dies when the issue of euthanasia is NOT related to an unequivocal medical issue.

Veterinarians are medically trained. Ethically speaking, however, they are as individualistic and subjective as any other human being, with their own set of internal guidelines, morals and imperatives. Nor are veterinarians necessarily behaviouralists. Animal behaviorists are highly trained and competent in assessing behavioral issues in animals and the potential of those animals to be rehabilitated.

Ageism is another issue in many shelters, many of which operate on the premise that only young, healthy animals have the possibility of being adopted, and as such, older (even if relatively healthy) animals should be refused or if surrendered regardless, euthanized as being “unadoptable.

The reality of course is far different.

As Nathan Winograd has successfully proven again and again, there is a home for every animal.

In my three years of volunteer work with the dogs at the THS, I have been astonished, humbled and ecstatic at people and the compassion and genuine love they can show to even the oldest, most fragile – and yes, smelliest! dogs that have come in and are subsequently (often quickly) adopted out.

As I have noted before, Icy was a healthy, well-behaved if older dog that SHOULD have been given a chance to enjoy her twilight years as a cosseted and loved member of a family. What she did NOT deserve was to be labeled a “problem” or “unadoptable” (my surmise only) and summarily executed.

If the “new” THS is to find its feet, it MUST start showing the people of Toronto that in rejecting the negative aspects of the old regime, it also embraces some of the positive reasons why Tim Trow was successful in running a shelter where the public KNEW the old, the infirm, the sick, the abused, the neglected and the unwanted at least had a chance.

While there is no question that there were MANY thing wrong with the “old” THS, Icy would be alive under that regime.

Death is final. Making that decision requires more than a medical degree. It requires compassion, balance and a willingness to do whatever can be done to rehabilitate, treat (medically or otherwise), and give an animal TIME to adjust and make changes.

For decisions OTHER than clear-cut medical ones – I implicitly believe that decisions on euthanasia at the “new” THS must and should require a balance of perspective. A veterinarian, absolutely, an animal behaviourist (of which there are several on staff) as well as input from management. As a group, based on clearly delineated policies (hopefully soon to reflect the no-kill mindset), decisions can be made.

The THS has as its new Board some wonderful people with a solid background in animal rights and care - further, some excellent strategies are planned - such as this week`s brainstorming with Calgary`s very impressive Bill Bruce who has done wonders within that city for the no kill movement and the reopening of the kitten nursery.

For more 100 year, the THS represented the best in animal welfare to the people of Toronto. It has stood as the beacon for animal rights, the voice that speaks up for those who cannot speak for themselves, a haven for those rejected and abused by those who should cherish them. It has, above all, epitomized “sanctuary”.

If the THS is to survive, let them show the people of Toronto they continue to be a place where future Icy’s will find solace and safe haven. 

[UPDATE: This has been edited to remove material that might be potentially legally contentious- nothing of import is changed however]

Dog Training Seminar this weekend at the THS -

Last chance to sign up for an indepth training seminar with uber trainer Sam Malatesta, to be held at the Toronto Humane Society this weekend, Saturday and Sunday, August 21 and 22. Thanks to Garth Jermome and THS staff who have agreed to make the facility available.  Kudos also to Mr. Jerome for encouraing his staff to attend.

Sam has worked with dogs his entire life.  His approach is unique, provocative and most of all WORKS.  My own dogs, two german shepherds and one demented terrier are entering their fourth month of Sam's program and the improvement in their behaviour is simply unbelievable.  Each of my dogs is a rescue and thus comes with their own unique set of issues.  Finn, my black and tan was found starving on city streets, full of parasites, cuts, contusions and bruises, bald from a brutal case of mange and a commensurate skin infection.  Llyr was a backyard dog - spent 2 and half years of his life tied up with minimal contact and no socialization.  Darcy was a THS dog - came in abused (horribly) and lived his life in a frenzy of terror (making him a serious biter). 

Put the three together as I did and inside the house (after working with them - I acquired each of them at different times) they were AWESOME ... let someone walk near the door and the Hounds of Hell were let loose.

I had them at various trainers - we did the prong thing (AWFUL - I jettisoned it as soon as they finished their course), we did the alpha roll thing (WORSE - nothing like taking an already insecure dog and FORCING him into something that doesn't even HAPPEN in the wild), we did the too many treats thing, the ignore thing and the result was three messed up dogs ...

I attended Sam's last seminar in May and despite being Sam's "bitch" (sighs - the perfect example of the bad owner and bad dog) - I LEARNED ... and got insight and illumination.  A month later I began his program.

Still in the program as the older the dog the longer it takes to fix the issues - my guys are happy, relaxed and a PLEASURE to have around.  For the first time in the 10 months I have had him, Darcy walks with his head in the air, his tail over his back, wagging mightily (he used to slink with his head down, shaking with anxiety, scavenging for food).  In the past month, TWO strangers at different times walked into the backyard when he was having his time to play and he DID NOT BITE.  That is unbelievable!

Llyr's anxiety is less than half of what it used to be.  He has stopped jumping (for the most part) on people, he ignores people walking by on the street (he used to just about go through the window - typical screwed up territorial issues from being a backyard dog). Finn used to go ballistic when she saw other dogs or people, now she might yap for a second but settles down quicly and ignores them.

The program runs at the THS from 9:30 to 5:30.  If you would like to sign up, email me and I can put you in touch with the co-ordinator OR turn up at the door Saturday morning. You are also welcome to come for one or the other of the days if you don't want to go to both.

Cost is $150 for the two days or $75 for one.

Visit Sam's website for some excellent blogs on his philosphy.