Meet Hetzel’s puppies… meet Hetzel – oh sorry, you can’t-
the THS killed her and left her 11 puppies without a mother. (photo from Huffington Post)
Hetzel was dumped at the THS in early February. Shortly
thereafter, this abandoned mum gave birth to 11 beautiful puppies.
Nursing mothers are by nature protective. Any new mother should be given a quiet, safe
environment with minimal interaction and only necessary handling of the
puppies. She is territorial, protective
and apprehensive about anyone approaching her puppies. That is NORMAL
behaviour. The inevitably busy shelter
environment, compounded by the greater possibility of germs and transmission of
conditions which could be fatal to young pups made this a less than ideal environment for a nursing
mum. Yet she was apparently doing ok- if
stressed and unhappy and worried about her pups.
When a mother dog gives birth, a powerful hormone cocktail
invades her system. Oxytocin, prolactin and estrogen are all released into her
bloodstream and each provides her with a way to bond with and protect her
puppies. She needs a place where she feels safe and protected. Due to the declining levels of progesterone,
the increased levels of prolactin and climbing estrogen (versus declining
progesterone) means mum may be more grumpy than usual as well. Again, that is NORMAL behaviour and to be
expected.
Hetzel was then transferred to a foster home (about which I
know nothing). Dealing with nursing mums
requires a highly specialized skill set.
Keep in mind, Hetzel was dumped when pregnant so already in a stressed
and anxious mindset; then in a less than perfect atmosphere (a loud, chaotic
shelter – while I’m sure the THS did their best you can’t provide the kind of
healthy quiet environment that would be optimum for a dog giving birth) gave birth to 11 puppies which in itself would be a challenge for any dog. She is sent to a
foster home. I have no idea what the
situation was in the foster home – whether Hetzel was with provided a safe,
quiet and remote area where she wouldn’t be bothered … whether her puppies were
handled too much, her space invaded. If
so, these could be exacerbating factors to making a dog aggressive. In a best case scenario, the foster
home was an experienced one used to dealing with mother and pups, but that
would still leave mum in a hormonally charged, anxious state of mind.
Then this past week, Hetzel was killed.
This lactating mother was killed, leaving her less than
6-week old puppies without a mother and without a mother’s care and milk. Mother dogs naturally start the weaning
process at around 4 weeks- but nursing continues together with important
socialization from the mother to between 8 and 12 weeks. But that aside (as the
pups can be bottle fed as a poor substitute), I am seriously trying to get my
head around how the THS could kill this mother in view of the circumstances
surrounding her arrival there and subsequent experiences.
How, in the scant 7 weeks or so that they had this dog
(whom, I might add, they utilized, I’m sure very successfully, as a donation
driver), they were able to ascertain she was unable to be “rehabilitated”?
She was still with her VERY young puppies!
She was still in a hormonally charged, stressed and anxious
state of mind.
In a scant few weeks, she dealt with some major,
life-altering, frightening situations, compounded by massive hormonal
fluctuations and changes in her body.
I have been told it was because she bit.
Frankly, that sounds like a normal reaction to a stressful,
frightening situation scared dogs
protecting their pups will bite.
The THS claims to have experienced, specialized staff.
They claim to have experienced foster homes.
When questioned about their euthanasia policy, the THS has responded in the past that when it is a behavioural issue, every attempt is made to resolve the problem before the consensus is that there is no rehabilitation possible.
Considering these pups are barely 6 weeks old, the mother is lactating and full of pregnancy hormones, she has experienced several massive lifestyle shocks and been thrust into situations over which she has no control hardly constitutes giving her a chance.
Just how much behavioural modification could have occurred in the past few weeks? Simple logic dictates next to none.
At the very least, she should have been spayed and allowed the time for her body to normalize. Spaying has often proved to be a helpful and positive tool when dealing with maternal aggression.
When questioned about their euthanasia policy, the THS has responded in the past that when it is a behavioural issue, every attempt is made to resolve the problem before the consensus is that there is no rehabilitation possible.
Considering these pups are barely 6 weeks old, the mother is lactating and full of pregnancy hormones, she has experienced several massive lifestyle shocks and been thrust into situations over which she has no control hardly constitutes giving her a chance.
Just how much behavioural modification could have occurred in the past few weeks? Simple logic dictates next to none.
At the very least, she should have been spayed and allowed the time for her body to normalize. Spaying has often proved to be a helpful and positive tool when dealing with maternal aggression.
This was a massive and unforgivable failure.
The fact that this dog was not provided with an opportunity
to be rehabilitated ONCE her pups were weaned (properly at 8 weeks minimum) is
so incredibly wrong that my philosophical differences with the THS which
precipitated my leaving 2 years ago have now become an active and implacable
belief that this organization has betrayed the very values it purports to
exemplify and at this point, is beyond redemption.
I bet they get good money for those pups though; ironically
I remember members of the current Board criticizing Trow for getting the best
bid on puppies back in the day.
How the mighty have fallen.
“And what sort of lives do these people, who pose as being
moral, lead themselves? My dear fellow, you forget that we are in the native
land of the hypocrite.”
― Oscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray
Note: I have attempted through email to get the THS viewpoint for the past day or two and despite contacting several board members and Board President Marcie Laking (as well as the THS communication and media department and facebook messaging) not received an answer. I would be more than happy to hear from them.
UPDATE: Board Member David Bronskill got back to me and said that Hetzel had bitten numerous times and THS policy had been followed in terms of the decision to euthanize her as she was deemed a "significant risk". I stand by my comments above. I continue to question how in view of the timeline and the stress this dog was under that ANY type of meaningful behaviour modification was attempted. Thank you for your reply however.
Note: I have attempted through email to get the THS viewpoint for the past day or two and despite contacting several board members and Board President Marcie Laking (as well as the THS communication and media department and facebook messaging) not received an answer. I would be more than happy to hear from them.
UPDATE: Board Member David Bronskill got back to me and said that Hetzel had bitten numerous times and THS policy had been followed in terms of the decision to euthanize her as she was deemed a "significant risk". I stand by my comments above. I continue to question how in view of the timeline and the stress this dog was under that ANY type of meaningful behaviour modification was attempted. Thank you for your reply however.
Excellent post! Shame on the Toronto Humane Society for failing this dog. I had such high hopes for their new leadership after Trow but they have failed miserably and have deteriorated into complacent bureaucrats who are there only for the easy animals, not the ones who need a bit of extra love, care, and understanding. I am deeply ashamed for having ever been a part of it.
ReplyDeleteHere is my quick response: http://lilmacbreakingoftheshell.blogspot.ca/2014/03/the-toronto-humane-society-betrays.html
DeleteYet the THS adopted out 'NUTMEG' who had a known bite history, was adopted and returned for biting. The dog requires his leash to be attached at all times because he BITE if touched. He was adopted out to a first time dog owner! What the hell is going on over there..
ReplyDelete