Intakes are subject to the following provisos:
- Staffing to Animal ratios have to meet minimal standards, but OH LOOK, the THS has and continues to lay off staff! Catch 22!! Adequate staff are needed to take care of the animals but BECAUSE there are NO animals, because finances are suffering due to the FLOOD of bad press, no new memberships (the current Board’s bad in that respect!), no adoptions, etc, there is no income being generated (or minimal income). So how are they supposed to hire staff when they don’t have the animals?
- NO Strays – now THIS is something I find questionable! Ms. McDonald informed us last night that TAS ONLY has the right to take in strays – that for what, 20 years? the THS has been doing so ILLEGALLY. Which again begs the question – if that were the case, then WHY hasn’t this been addressed before? As I consider that one of their primary functions – in that strays have a far better chance of rehabilitation and surviving at the THS rather than at TAS – this is something that will need to be addressed!
- No clarification on what is considered “acceptable” intakes; but that is simply because that issue (amongst the others) did not come up – we should enquire and get a definitive answer whether there will be parameters on which animals will be ‘acceptable” for intake to the “new” THS.
No comments:
Post a Comment